United States v. Encarnacion Gonzalez-Villalobo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant “has shown that he exhausted his administrative remedies” and satisfied (d)(1) by “appealing the Immigration Judge []’s adverse ruling to the Board of Immigration Appeals”
• holding that defendant had opportunity for judicial review and emphasizing that petitioner “did, in fact, seek judicial review,” namely “a petition for writ of habeas corpus” that he later withdrew voluntarily (emphasis in original)
• recognizing exceptions to the exhaustion requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) where an individual is deprived of his right to appeal to the Board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).