United States v. Emmett Lovell Nabors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming multiple § 924(c) convictions where the underlying predicate offenses were \distinct and require[d] proof of facts not required by the other predicate\
• finding officers’ failure to wait a reasonable period of time justified by threats to officers’ safety, threats to the safety of third parties, and the need to preserve evidence
• \18 U.S.C. S 3162(a)(1) only requires the dismissal of the of fense charged in the complaint . . . .\
• forced entry moments after police announcement not unlawful where affidavit for search warrant indicated that occupant was suspected of narcotics trafficking and illegal possession of firearms and that he habitually wore a bullet-proof vest
• evidence of exigent circumstances drawn entirely from affidavit furnished for search warrant
• “While it might be argued that the officers waited an insufficient time prior to knocking down the door to the apartment, certainly we agree with the district court that exigent circumstances justified the officers’ behavior

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).