United States v. Emmanuell Obi Maduka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that information provided by defendant was not complete enough to satisfy the 12 Nos. 04-1697/04-1754 United States v. Rodriguez-Ruiz, et al. safety valve requirement because it failed to describe the involvement of others in the relevant conduct
• relying on “[t]he conflict between [defendant’s] statements at the time of the drug transactions and his statement at sentencing” to support the conclusion that he was not credible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).