United States v. Elmer Davis, Jr., United States of America v. Ralph Wynn, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding without discussion that “the right to consult a lawyer, at any time” was an adequate warning
• describing the contention that Miranda was violated where a suspect “was not clearly apprised of the fact that he could terminate any questioning” as “without merit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).