Skip to main content
· 1/27/1993

United States v. Ellowood Eugene Bennett, United States of America v. Ray Austin Bennett

Citations

  • 984 F.2d 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a district court, in sustaining an objection to an inappropriate question on cross-examination, effectively minimized the prejudice of an inappropriate question
  • finding that a district court, in sustaining an objection to an inappro- priate question on cross-examination, effectively minimized the preju- dice of an inappropriate question
  • applying the standard to an allegedly improper question asked during cross- examination
  • prosecutor's reference to defen- dant as being in custody was not so prejudicial as to warrant a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton, Sprouse, Kaufman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.