Skip to main content
· 6/5/2015

United States v. Elliott Duke

Citations

  • 788 F.3d 392
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9439
  • 2015 WL 3540562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Miller forecloses the issue whether § 2G2.2 produces unreasonable sentences because it lacks an empirical basis
  • vacating special condition that banned all contact with minors in perpetuity where “the record d[id] not support imposing such a sweeping ban for such an extended duration of time”
  • vacating special condition that banned all contact with minors in perpetuity where “the record d[id] not support imposing such a sweeping ban for such an extended duration of time”
  • striking down an absolute lifetime ban on computer or internet access
  • “[O]ur case law requires that Internet bans be narrowly tailored either by scope or by duration.”
  • “[O]ur case law requires that Internet bans be narrowly tailored either by scope or by duration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, King, Elrod

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.