· 6/5/2015
United States v. Elliott Duke
Citations
- 788 F.3d 392
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9439
- 2015 WL 3540562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that Miller forecloses the issue whether § 2G2.2 produces unreasonable sentences because it lacks an empirical basis
- vacating special condition that banned all contact with minors in perpetuity where “the record d[id] not support imposing such a sweeping ban for such an extended duration of time”
- vacating special condition that banned all contact with minors in perpetuity where “the record d[id] not support imposing such a sweeping ban for such an extended duration of time”
- striking down an absolute lifetime ban on computer or internet access
- “[O]ur case law requires that Internet bans be narrowly tailored either by scope or by duration.”
- “[O]ur case law requires that Internet bans be narrowly tailored either by scope or by duration.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, King, Elrod
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.