United States v. Eliseo Sanchez Rueda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 25 that probable cause existed where “DEA agents were given an 26 accurate description of Rueda, and several specific details 27 given them occurred exactly as [informant] had recounted or 28 predicted”
• holding 28 that probable cause existed where “DEA agents were given an 29 accurate description of Rueda, and several specific details 30 given them occurred exactly as [informant] had recounted or 31 predicted”
• no need to show past reliability where informant is in fact a participant in the very crime at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).