United States v. Elia Orlando

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the \knowledge\ relevant for a retaliation claim \must be tied to the decision-maker involved in the unfavorable personnel action\
• noting that the “ ‘knowledge’ relevant for a retaliation claim. must be tied to the decision-maker involved in the unfavorable personnel action”
• explaining that the “knowledge” relevant for a retaliation claim “must be tied to the decision-maker involved in the unfavorable personnel action”
• holding under an analogous anti-retaliation statute that “[t]he ‘knowledge’ relevant for a retaliation claim ... must be tied to the decision-maker involved in the unfavorable personnel action”
• “The ‘knowledge’ relevant for a retaliation claim under the FRSA must be tied to the decision-maker involved in the unfavorable personnel action.”
• railroad was entitled to judgment on FRSA claim because employee had no evidence of animus or knowledge by relevant decision-makers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).