Skip to main content
· 11/3/2005

United States v. Eli Santiago

Citations

  • 428 F.3d 699
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23724
  • 2005 WL 2877717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that suspect who realized his family may be in legal jeopardy was not coerced into providing consent to search home when he negotiated commitment that his fam‐ ily be “kept out of this”
  • holding that suspect who realized his family may be in legal jeopardy was not coerced into providing consent to search home when he negotiated commitment that his fam‐ ily be “kept out of this”
  • holding that suspect who realized his family may be in legal jeopardy was not coerced into providing consent to search home when he negotiated commitment that his fam‐ ily be “kept out of this”
  • noting that a prosecutor may comment upon inconsistencies in a defendant’s post-Miranda statements without violating Miranda

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.