· 10/9/1996
United States v. El Tora Graham
Citations
- 91 F.3d 213
- 319 U.S. App. D.C. 409
- 1996 WL 446794
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \'One of the express limitations upon the right to choose one's own attorney is that the criminal defendant be 'financially able' to retain counsel of his choice.'\
- trial court’s failure to engage defendant in colloquy regarding cause of dissatisfaction with assigned counsel before denying motion for new counsel did not prejudice defendant where assigned counsel ultimately provided effective assistance trial
- “As the constitutional right to choice of counsel does not apply, however, Graham must show not only that the district court improperly disposed of his motions for substitute counsel, but also that the error was prejudicial to his case....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams, Ginsburg, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.