United States v. Ekasala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• (\The Court will not ... abandon judicial restraint and invade the province of the legislature by rewriting its terms.” (citing Brown v. State
• \Such a per se rule [that a political subdivision of a State may not raise constitutional objections to the validity of a state statute] is inconsistent with [Board of Educ. v.] Allen [392 U.S. 236
• \It is not the office of courts to give opinions on abstract propositions of 1 \The Virginia General Assembly amended [Code] § 20-108.2 to mirror the federal law.\ Richardson v. Richardson
• \[T]he mere fact that a sentencing court has discretion to disagree with the guidelines on policy grounds does not mean that it is required to do so.\ (citation omitted)
• \To give an accused a second trial each time he doubts
• \attempting to cram a reverse discrimination case into the McDonnell Douglas framework is not a reasonable approach. Cully v. Milliman & Robertson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).