· 11/5/2009
United States v. Eisom
Citations
- 585 F.3d 552
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24346
- 2009 WL 3669746
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stressing that waiver precludes review while forfeiture permits review, albeit only for plain error
- explaining that “waiver implies an intention to forgo a known right, whereas forfeiture implies something less deliberate — say, oversight, inadvertence, or neglect in asserting a potential right”
- finding defendant waived particular sentencing claim when he objected below and then withdrew his objection
- “Typically, a waived claim is dead and buried; it Page 12 Appellate Case: 23-3116 Document: 010111097399 Date Filed: 08/20/2024 Page: 13 cannot thereafter be resurrected on appeal.”
- “Typically, a waived claim is dead and buried.”
- finding waiver when appellant withdrew objection previously raised
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Selya, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.