Skip to main content
· 11/5/2009

United States v. Eisom

Citations

  • 585 F.3d 552
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24346
  • 2009 WL 3669746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stressing that waiver precludes review while forfeiture permits review, albeit only for plain error
  • explaining that “waiver implies an intention to forgo a known right, whereas forfeiture implies something less deliberate — say, oversight, inadvertence, or neglect in asserting a potential right”
  • finding defendant waived particular sentencing claim when he objected below and then withdrew his objection
  • “Typically, a waived claim is dead and buried; it Page 12 Appellate Case: 23-3116 Document: 010111097399 Date Filed: 08/20/2024 Page: 13 cannot thereafter be resurrected on appeal.”
  • “Typically, a waived claim is dead and buried.”
  • finding waiver when appellant withdrew objection previously raised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Selya, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.