United States v. Eisenhardt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• soundly criticizing the reasoning of Singleton , particularly the application of the exclusionary rule
• criticizing Single- ton's reasoning, particularly application of exclusionary rule
• criticizing Single- ton's reasoning, particularly application of exclusionary rule
• Singleton opinion was “amazingly unsound” and “nonsensical”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).