United States v. Ehrlich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence that the government's experts collaborated with the government's non–testifying litigation consultant in drafting expert reports was insufficient to established that the reports were “ghost written” by the consultant so as to warrant preclusion of their testimony
• an adverse inference requires more than negligent loss, it “requires a showing that the party knew the evidence was relevant to some issue at trial and that his willful conduct resulted in its loss or destruction” and “some quantum of blameworthiness is required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).