United States v. Ehizele Seignious

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a district court’s view of the evidence must only be “plausible in light of the record viewed in its entirety”
• assuming error in context of plain error review and \jumping straight\ to second and third prongs of analysis
• explaining that, to determine—on plain error review— whether district court erroneously calculated loss amount, the court must first determine whether the district court committed clear error in finding that loss amount was supported by a preponderance of the evidence
• “Seignious had fair opportunity to challenge -[the] evidence (proffered by the Government to support its restitution calculation].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).