United States v. Efren Romero and Raphael Lara-Aceves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Alternative explanations alone, even if plausible, do not ordinarily overcome the defendant’s burden in challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.”
• admission of expert testimony reviewed under a manifestly erroneous standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).