United States v. Efrain Becerra-Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “Indian Civil Rights Act ... imposed an ‘identical limitation’ on tribal government conduct as the Fourth Amendment.”
• rejecting that a traffic stop “is automatically unreasonable if the officers lacked authority to conduct the seizure”
• stating that the Fourth Amendment “does not directly apply to the conduct of tribal governments”
• holding “the reasonableness of a seizure depends exclusively on federal law” and noting “the well-established proposition that an arrest in violation of state law may still be constitutionally reasonable”
• noting that under the Fourth Amendment, “investigative traffic stops” require “only reasonable suspicion”
• noting that under the Fourth Amendment, “investigative traffic stops” require “only reasonable suspicion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).