· 2/16/1983
United States v. Edwin R. Salovitz
Citations
- 701 F.2d 17
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- while leave to amend shall be freely given, “futile amendments 18 should not be permitted.”
- “It is common knowledge that defense counsel quite often waive openings as a simple matter of trial strategy . . . [s]uch a waiver has been held to be ‘trivial.’” (internal citations omitted)
- “We believe that an opening statement by the defendant is not [a constitutionally] guaranteed right, and that the making and timing of opening statements can be left constitutionally to the informed discretion of the trial judge.”
- discussing rationales for allowing or disallowing opening statement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Graafeiland, Timbers, Van Graafei-Land Pratt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.