Skip to main content
· 2/16/1983

United States v. Edwin R. Salovitz

Citations

  • 701 F.2d 17
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • while leave to amend shall be freely given, “futile amendments 18 should not be permitted.”
  • “It is common knowledge that defense counsel quite often waive openings as a simple matter of trial strategy . . . [s]uch a waiver has been held to be ‘trivial.’” (internal citations omitted)
  • “We believe that an opening statement by the defendant is not [a constitutionally] guaranteed right, and that the making and timing of opening statements can be left constitutionally to the informed discretion of the trial judge.”
  • discussing rationales for allowing or disallowing opening statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Timbers, Van Graafei-Land Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.