United States v. Edward Velazquez, Joseph Bergen, and Patrick Regnier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating the defendant's sentence and remanding for sentencing because the sentence exceeded by four months the maximum that could be imposed without a jury determination of an element of the crime
• staying issuance of the mandate for 30 days “to afford the Appellants an opportunity to inform the Clerk within that time whether they wish to withdraw their pending appeals”
• collecting cases finding that intent to do serious bodily harm or extreme reckless disregard for human life can suffice to show malice
• vacating the defendant's sentence and remanding for sentencing because the sentence exceeded by four months the maximum that could be imposed without a jury determination of an element of the crime
• “[T]he prevailing view has been that words can engender heat of passion only if the words impart information of a highly provocative nature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).