United States v. Edward Tholl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding application of U.S.S.G. § 2J1.4(b)(1) did not preclude application of § 3A1.3 because “an arrest, as that term is used in [§] 2J1.4(b)(1), does not necessarily entail the sort of forcible physical restraint contemplated by” § 3A1.3
• court rejected defendant’s claim that he was a minor participant because he did not concoct the scheme for which he was convicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).