Skip to main content
· 1/6/2006

United States v. Edward Sistrunk

Citations

  • 432 F.3d 917
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 253
  • 2006 WL 27274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a restitution order was beyond the scope of an appeal waiver under which defendant had waived his right to appeal his sentence
  • finding restitution order was beyond scope of waiver of appeal where provision provided that defendant waived his rights to appeal if sentence was above specific offense level
  • finding restitution order was beyond scope of waiver of appeal where provision provided that defendant waived his rights to appeal if sentence was above specific offense level
  • appeal of restitution order was not barred by appeal waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Lay, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.