Skip to main content
· 1/10/1995

United States v. Edward Shields

Citations

  • 44 F.3d 673
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 280
  • 1995 WL 6045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding enhancement not appropriate because firearms were seized from defendant’s home thirty-seven days after last known drug sale occurred
  • sufficient if weapon readily accessible and ammunition nearby
  • sufficient if weapon readily accessible and ammunition nearby

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bogue, Bowman, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.