United States v. Edward Roy Windle, AKA Eddy Windle, AKA Ed Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a record indicating counsel was waived in the predicate misdemeanor case is sufficient, in the absence of contrary allegations, to make the conviction constitutionally valid for enhancement purposes
• stating that “[o]nce the prosecution establishes the existence of a conviction, the defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the conviction was constitutionally infirm”
• implicitly limiting “matter controverted” under Rule 32(c)(1) to factual challenges and rejecting a challenge under Rule 32(c)(1) to the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines to undisputed facts
• factual dispute over -4- presentence report’s conclusion that gun defendant possessed was stolen not plain error
• additional weapons violations should be included as relevant conduct because firearms possessed during a four to five month period meet the \same course of conduct\ requirement in sec. 3D1.2
• considering Rule 32(c)(1), in effect from 1994 to 2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).