Skip to main content
· 7/19/2006

United States v. Edward Rosenthal, United States of America v. Edward Rosenthal

Citations

  • 454 F.3d 943
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18101
  • 2006 WL 2005974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that consulting a dictionary definition for the meaning of \malice\ constituted the consideration of extrinsic information
  • noting that in returning seized marijuana to an individual pursuant to a state law mandating the return of such marijuana, the officers were “enforcing” that state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Gibson, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.