· 7/19/2006
United States v. Edward Rosenthal, United States of America v. Edward Rosenthal
Citations
- 454 F.3d 943
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18101
- 2006 WL 2005974
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that consulting a dictionary definition for the meaning of \malice\ constituted the consideration of extrinsic information
- noting that in returning seized marijuana to an individual pursuant to a state law mandating the return of such marijuana, the officers were “enforcing” that state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Gibson, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.