United States v. Edward Marx, Frank Sladek and Keith Herring

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the failure to deliver a copy of the search warrant to the party searched does not invalidate the search in the absence of a showing of prejudice
• explaining that “[i]n order to show prejudice in this context, a defendant must show that because of the violation of Rule 41 he was subjected to a search that might not have occurred or would not have been so abrasive had the rule been followed.”
• “The defendant’s assent to a conspiracy may be inferred from acts which furthered the purpose of the conspiracy.”
• constructive possession is the knowing power or right to exercise dominion or control over a proscribed substance and can be joint or exclusive
• “[a]ssent to a conspiracy may be inferred from acts which furthered the purpose of the conspiracy.”
• \[a]ssent to a conspiracy may be inferred from acts which furthered the purpose of the conspiracy.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).