United States v. Edward Leonardo Paredes, Also Known as Ed Paredes, Also Known as Eddie Perales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the scheme relocated \to evade law enforcement\ where fraudulently obtained goods \moved from Utah to Idaho because Utah became 'hot' after one of the [defendants] was arrested [there]\
• determining that the scheme relocated “to evade law enforcement” where fraudulently obtained goods “moved from Utah to Idaho because Utah became ‘hot’ after one of the [participants] was arrested”
• determining that the scheme relocated “to evade law enforcement” where fraudu- lently obtained goods “moved from Utah to Idaho because Utah became ‘hot’ after one of the [participants] was arrest- ed”
• stating that the district court doesn’t need to “recite on the record” 7 Appellate Case: 24-2108 Document: 61-1 Date Filed: 08/25/2025 Page: 8 each of the sentencing factors to show that it “fulfilled its responsibility” to consider the statutory factors
• interpreting Guideline § 2B1.1(b)((A), the amended version of § 2F1.1(b)(6)(A), and holding that the enhancement “contains no requirement of concealment, other than the 28 relocation itself”). The district court therefore did not err in applying § 2F1.1(b)(6)(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).