· 5/12/1994
United States v. Edward L. Powell
Citations
- 24 F.3d 28
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3345
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 6355
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10482
- 1994 WL 178408
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When sentence was imposed on the severed counts, [defendant] was entitled to appeal because there was nothing left to be done but to enforce the sentence.”
- when a count is severed from a multi-count indictment, and separate trials are held on the severed counts, each conviction on the severed counts is separately appealable when sentence is entered
- court determines whether there is a genuine issue for trial but 1 does not weigh the evidence or determine the truth of matters asserted
- “When sentence was imposed on the sev ered counts, [defendant] was entitled to appeal because there was nothing left to be done but to enforce the sentence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Poole, Beezer, Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.