Skip to main content
· 5/12/1994

United States v. Edward L. Powell

Citations

  • 24 F.3d 28
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3345
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 6355
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10482
  • 1994 WL 178408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When sentence was imposed on the severed counts, [defendant] was entitled to appeal because there was nothing left to be done but to enforce the sentence.”
  • when a count is severed from a multi-count indictment, and separate trials are held on the severed counts, each conviction on the severed counts is separately appealable when sentence is entered
  • court determines whether there is a genuine issue for trial but 1 does not weigh the evidence or determine the truth of matters asserted
  • “When sentence was imposed on the sev ered counts, [defendant] was entitled to appeal because there was nothing left to be done but to enforce the sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poole, Beezer, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.