United States v. Edward James Clary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any disparate impact on African-Americans resulting from 100-to-1 ratio does not violate Equal Protection Clause
• holding that disparate crack/powder cocaine penalties did not violate equal protection
• providing a comprehensive list of citations to prior decisions by this court on the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).