United States v. Edward J. Fisch, Ivan L. Glasscock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants did not exhibit an expectation of privacy in statements that were “audible to the naked ear” of police in an adjoining hotel room
• overhearing of clearly audible conversation in adjoining motel room not a “search”
• observations with naked ears of conversations in adjoining motel room
• doctrine requires \lawful physical contact with the container\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).