United States v. Edward J. Ahrens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in accordance with customary principles governing evidentiary presumptions, application of the presumption of official regularity “rests upon probabilities, not certainties”
• noting that, in accordance with customary principles governing evidentiary presumptions, application of the presumption of official regularity “rests upon probabilities, not certainties”
• invoking the doctrine of official regularity to prove the validity of a notice of deficiency when its existence is not disputed
• Rule 803(6) \does not require personal knowledge of the maker of the record as a condition precedent to its admission into evidence\
• \The form [3877] is considered highly probative evidence that the notice of deficiency was sent to the addresses specified.\
• \The form [3877] is considered highly probative evidence that the notice of deficiency was sent to the addresses specified.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).