Skip to main content
· 5/24/1995

United States v. Edward F. McDonough Jr.

Citations

  • 56 F.3d 381
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12608
  • 1995 WL 314723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the defendant's appeal focused on \the element of the extortion victim's state of mind\
  • upholding conviction where scheme involved kickbacks to the appellant totaling “nearly $100,000, for which [he] performed almost no work”
  • conviction under mail fraud indictment will stand if evidence indicates statute violated in either of two ways charged
  • “As to the others, it is difficult to see how jurors who are aware of the existence of a news article, but unaware of its content, could be prejudiced by such awareness.”
  • jurors are presumed to follow instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Van Graafeiland Kearse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.