Skip to main content
· 10/4/1996

United States v. Edward Adio Badru

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 1471
  • 321 U.S. App. D.C. 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence “offered as direct evidence of the fact in issue” is not an “other” crime
  • “In cases where the incident offered is a part of the conspiracy alleged in the indictment, the evidence is admissible under Rule 404(b) because it is not an ‘other’ crime.”
  • Rule 404(b) may exclude evidence that is “extrinsic” to the crime charged
  • quoting, in turn, Weeks, 716 F.2d at 83

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.