United States v. Eduardo Bibo-Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that subsequent acts may raise an inference of prior knowledge
• recognizing that subsequent acts may raise an inference of prior knowledge
• holding subsequent-act evidence was admissible to prove intent
• holding subsequent-act evidence was admissible to prove intent
• “By its very terms, 404(b) does 20 not distinguish between ‘prior’ and ‘subsequent’ acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).