United States v. Edmund Davis, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the Commission’s view, prohibiting reductions below the amended guidelines range except in the case of substantial assistance to the government struck the appropriate balance.”
• “[Section 1B1.10(b)(2)(A)] prohibits a court from reducing a defendant’s sentence to a term that is less than the minimum of the amended guidelines range . . . .”
• “[Section 1B1.10(b)(2)(A)] prohibits a court from reducing a defendant’s sentence to a term that is less than the minimum of the amended guidelines range . . . .”
• section lB1.10(b)(2) does not violate separation of powers
• “[T]he Commission sought to avoid undue complexity[.]”
• “[T]he Commission sought to avoid undue complexity[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).