Skip to main content
· 11/4/1968

United States v. Edison R. Nogueira

Citations

  • 403 F.2d 816
  • 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the purpose of the Multiple Surface use was to halt mining claim including the “acquisition of mining claims for ‘residence or summer camp purposes’ ”
  • upholding the right of the United States to seek to enjoin the use of an unpat-ented mining claim for a residence wholly unrelated to any mining activity whatsoever
  • district court remedy is necessary to prevent the government from being “kept out of possession of its property”
  • “[P]ermanent residence . . . not reason- ably related to prospecting, mining or processing operations is not within the [permitted] uses.”
  • “a court could adequately determine the question of good faith”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ely, Carter, Belloni

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.