Skip to main content
· 12/11/1986

United States v. Edgar Salazar

Citations

  • 805 F.2d 1394
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34636

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate court cannot affirm conviction on a theory that the court raised sua sponte at oral argument because defendant would be “unfairly deprive[d] ... of the opportunity to adduce evidence in his favor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Norris, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.