United States v. Edgar Barraza-Maldonado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Davis good-faith exception applied where the officers conducted a search in the Ninth Circuit \in objectively reasonable reliance on binding Ninth Circuit precedent\
• stating that officers “should not be faulted for adhering to existing precedent until that precedent is authoritatively overruled”
• “[f]or the good faith exception to apply, officers performing a particular investigatory action—such as GPS tracking—must strictly comply with binding appellate precedent governing the jurisdiction in which they are acting”
• for the Davis good-faith exception to apply, “officers performing a particular investigatory action ... must strictly comply with binding appellate precedent governing the jurisdiction in which they are acting”
• for the Davis good-faith exception to apply, “officers performing a particular investigatory action . . . must strictly comply with binding appellate precedent governing the jurisdiction in which they are acting”
• “[f]or the good faith exception to apply, officers performing a particular investigatory action—such as GPS tracking—must strictly comply with binding appellate precedent governing the jurisdiction in which they are acting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).