United States v. Eddie Louthian, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the presumption of reasonableness “can only be rebutted by showing that the sentence is unreasonable when measured against the [Section] 3553(a) factors”
• explaining that while “criminal forfeiture is an in personam action that requires a conviction, civil forfeiture is an in rem action against the property itself”
• recognizing that within-Guidelines-range sentence is presumptively substantively reasonable
• recognizing that within-Guidelines-range sentence is presumptively substantively reasonable
• applying appellate presumption of reasonableness to a sentence imposed within a properly calculated advisory Guidelines range
• applying an appellate presumption of reasonableness to a sentence imposed within or below a properly calculated advisory Guidelines range

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).