Skip to main content
· 1/27/1975

United States v. Eddie Leroy Anderson

Citations

  • 509 F.2d 724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if the trial judge is satisfied that an in camera hearing is adequate to explore the foundations of the informant's information, then no disclosure is neces sary
  • trial court did not abuse discretion in holding in camera hearing regarding basis of informant’s knowledge in order to determine probable cause for arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hufstedler, Goodwin, Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.