United States v. Eddie L. Franklin and J.L. Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant faces waiver if he fails to renew a pretrial motion that the trial court has not ruled on
• noting the “specter of ‘sand bagging” and applying plain error review as a result
• noting the “specter of ‘sand bagging’” and applying plain error review as a result
• noting the “specter of ‘sand bagging’” and applying plain error review as a result
• “We may refuse to review motions appealed [when the defendant had an opportunity to renew a motion No. 05-2113 11 and chooses not to] because they encourage parties to cache unanswered motions and, by so doing, disrupt the efficient function of the judicial process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).