United States v. Eddie Jackson Houston, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that stipulation was not erroneously admitted although it included a concession that defendant had prior state conviction, which “constituted a question of law”
• defendant complained that stipulation was based on mistake of law and therefore should not have been submitted to the jury
• defendant complained that stipulation was based on mistake of law and therefore should not have been submitted to the jury
• “[w]hen parties have entered into stipulations as to material facts, those facts will be deemed to have been conclusively established.”
• without quoting or paraphrasing any portion of the jury instruction, the court approved the submittal of a stipulation to the jury as conclusive proof of the fact stipu- lated to
• definition of 18 U.S.C. App. § 1202, not state law, governs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).