United States v. Eddie Howell and Wayne E. Kittle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no compelling prejudice where “[t]he evidence of [defendant’s] guilt ... was so overwhelming that there is no reason to conclude that [the spillover] evidence prevented a fair trial.”
• finding no compelling prejudice where “[t]he evidence of [defendant’s] guilt . . . was so overwhelming that there is no reason to conclude that [the spillover] evidence prevented a fair trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).