United States v. Eddie Earl Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, under § 3572(a), district court must consider factors before imposing fine and must make specific factual findings on these factors
• holding no second Rule 11 colloquy mandated when defendant “equivocates about his guilty plea after the initial plea hearing”
• finding, in case in which defendant failed to object at sentencing, that district court did not err in imposing $2,000 fine to be paid through Responsibility Program
• approving $2,000 fine to be paid over 63-month sentence and three years of supervised release
• upholding $2,000 fine under Harvey where defendant had five years in prison and three years' supervised release to pay the fine
• “The courts are presumed to have some passing familiarity with the conditions of confinement at a federal prison, including how much prisoners get paid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).