United States v. Eddie Alcarez Moreno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that advising a suspect of his right to refuse consent to search is an intervening circumstance that supports the voluntariness of consent
• holding that advising a suspect of his right to refuse consent to search is an intervening circumstance that supports the voluntariness of consent
• reasoning that a considerable passage of time between the illegal stop and second consent weighed in favor of a finding of voluntariness
• noting that the officer “advised [the defendant] that he had the right to refuse to consent to the search”
• noting that \the record is replete with evidence\ that suspect voluntarily and repeatedly consented to the search
• where although the stop was found to be illegal, there was no evidence that officers made the stop with the intent to “trick defendant [ ] into consenting to a search of his vehicle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).