Skip to main content
· 5/5/2008

United States v. Eberhard

Citations

  • 525 F.3d 175
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9630
  • 2008 WL 1930935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider defendant’s challenge to sentencing 4 1 enhancement when he failed to challenge Presentence Investigation Report in 2 district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Calabresi, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.