Skip to main content
· 11/4/1999

United States v. Earle R. Shepardson, Iii, Derek P. St. Don, David Maxwell

Citations

  • 196 F.3d 306
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 29727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, in situations where the Commission “so painstakingly enumerat[ed] the circumstances in which [an] enhancement does not apply, [the application note] indicates that the enhancement should be imposed where those specified criteria are not met”
  • analyzing section 2K2.1(a)(4), (a)(7), and (b)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Leval, Van Graafeiland Burns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.