· 11/4/1999
United States v. Earle R. Shepardson, Iii, Derek P. St. Don, David Maxwell
Citations
- 196 F.3d 306
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 29727
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, in situations where the Commission “so painstakingly enumerat[ed] the circumstances in which [an] enhancement does not apply, [the application note] indicates that the enhancement should be imposed where those specified criteria are not met”
- analyzing section 2K2.1(a)(4), (a)(7), and (b)(4)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burns, Leval, Van Graafeiland Burns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.