United States v. Dyke Hoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Rule 29 motion “generally arguing that the government presented insufficient evidence to convict . . . preserve[s] [all] sufficiency claims for appeal”
• courts and Congress use “expansive reasoning” when determining whether enforcement of state law is part of an officer’s official duties, including consideration of unwritten policies
• a deputy Marshal “is expected and authorized” to intervene “where there is harm or a threat of harm as a consequence of the violation of state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).