United States v. Dwayne Freeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the eighth amendment challenge to the clear and convincing standard of proof under the Insanity Defense Reform Act
• rejecting the eighth amendment challenge to the clear and convincing standard of proof under the Insanity Defense Reform Act
• “Leland compels a holding that the aspect of the Insanity [Defense] Reform Act of 1984 requiring a defendant to prove insanity by clear and convincing evidence is constitutional”
• defendant likely knew bank robbery was wrongful in light of his efforts to conceal himself, the use of a handgun, and his escape plan
• \ Leland compels a holding that the aspect of the Insanity [Defense] Reform Act of 1984 requiring a defendant to prove insanity by clear and convincing evidence is constitutional\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).