United States v. Dwaine Copeland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that credibility determinations are “the prov- ince of the factfinder”
• explaining that credibility determinations are “the prov- ince of the factfinder”
• explaining that credibility determinations are “the prov- ince of the factfinder”
• reviewing the district court’s finding a defendant violated the terms of his super- vised release for abuse of discretion
• reviewing a district court’s conclusion that an appellant violated the terms of his super- vised release for abuse of discretion
• stating credibility is in the province of the factfinder, and we ordi- narily will not review a district court’s credibility determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).