Skip to main content
· 12/21/1973

United States v. Durr

Citations

  • 22 C.M.A. 562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that certification was necessary for there to be a valid claim and as a jurisdictional prerequisite to a direct challenge of a contracting officer’s decision
  • contracting officer has no authority to waive a requirement imposed by Congress
  • “Unless [the certification] requirement is met, there is simply no claim that this court may review under the Act.”
  • “Unless [the certification] requirement is met, there is simply no claim that this court may review under the Act.”
  • “Unless [the certification] requirement is met,' there is simply no claim that this court may review under the Act.”
  • \The contracting officer ... had no authority to waive a [certification] requirement that Congress imposed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.